Hegazy, T; Abdel-Monem, M and Saad, D A (2014) Framework for enhanced progress tracking and control of linear projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 21(1), pp. 94-110. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose - This paper aims at improving progress tracking and control of repetitive projects by developing a novel framework that automates the documentation of as-built information directly into the project schedule and also introduces enhanced linear scheduling formulation to support project control decisions. Design/methodology/approach - The proposed framework uses e-mail technology to facilitate detailed tracking of daily as-built events of all parties through bidirectional communication between site and head office. It also provides a new formulation for more accurate critical path and linear scheduling computation to accurately update the project's time and cost during construction. Findings - Using a case study of a road project, the paper proves that the proposed framework reduces as-built documentation effort and its schedule updates are more responsive to all as-built events than traditional scheduling techniques. Research limitations/implications - The proposed method applies to linear projects (e.g. highways) and can be extended to other repetitive projects such as high-rise buildings. It can also be extended to include voice features and procedures for forensic schedule analysis. Practical implications - The developed methodology presents a low-cost approach to document timely progress information for decision makers of massive linear projects (often associated with infrastructure) to have better control over the execution of projects, save documentation time and cost, and avoid disputes and problems. Originality/value - This research contributes in improving construction productivity by collecting timely as-built information using affordable communication technologies. It also presents novel advancements to the existing scheduling and control techniques to suit linear projects, which are most challenging.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | as-built documentation; critical path segments; e-mail; linear projects; project control; scheduling |
| Index terms: | scheduling, dispute, progress tracking, e-mail, high-rise building, road project, repetitive project, documentation, computation, methodology, project control, construction productivity, case study, linear scheduling, critical path |
| Subjects: | construction type, production management, research methods, operations research, project controls, computational methods, data collection methods, professional development, communication, infrastructure engineering, dispute resolution, operations management, control systems |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Research Practice, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Construction Technology, Information Management, Time Control, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here