Jefferies, M; Brewer, G J and Gajendran, T (2014) Using a case study approach to identify critical success factors for alliance contracting. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 21(5), pp. 465-480. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose - There has been a significant increase in the use of relationship contracting in the global construction industry, with strategies such as Partnering, Alliancing and Public-Private Partnerships all used. These approaches were introduced to the Australian construction industry in the 1990s in an attempt to overcome the adversarial nature of traditional contracting methods. The purpose of this paper is to investigate factors that influence the successful implementation of Project Alliancing by means of a case study approach focusing on the procurement of a large water treatment plant. The research findings identify critical success factors (CSFs) both from literature and the case study project. Design/methodology/approach - The research traces the origins of Alliancing and identifies CSFs by reviewing literature and analysing a current case study project. The paper first identifies CSFs on a global scale by establishing a theoretical framework of CSFs and then compares this to the case study project. A case study of an Australian Alliance project is investigated whereby a semi-structured interview process, involving senior managers from the six partners from the Alliance, was used in conjunction with a review of project documentation. The findings of the case study project are compared to the literature and any new CSFs are identified. Findings - Alliancing helps to establish and manage the relationships between all parties, remove barriers and encourage maximum contribution to achieve success. Alliancing provides a project delivery method that promotes open communication, equality and a systematic problem resolution process. Team culture focusing on an “open book/no blame” approach is vital to the success of an Alliance. Five CSFs were identified as specifically influencing the success of the case study project: the use of an integrated Alliance office; the staging of project and stretch targets; establishing project specific key performance indicators; facilitating on-going workshops; and the integration of a web-based management programme. Originality/value - The research findings assist both public and private sectors by identifying factors that are critical for success in Alliancing. Five additional factors were identified as specifically influencing the success of the case study project. Since this research was conducted, Australia has seen a further increase in relationship contracting where the likes of Alliancing is often used as the default approach for certain Public Sector projects. Ongoing research into Alliancing is vital to ensure the development of sustainable procurement models, successful operational viability, fair risk distribution and value for money.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | case study; critical success factors; infrastructure; construction industry; alliance contracting; water treatment works |
| Index terms: | partnership, private sector, Australia, traditional contracting, public sector, partnering, alliancing, key performance indicator, case study, workshop, water treatment work, implementation, construction industry, resolution, project delivery, global construction, strategy, programme, manager, interview, alliance contracting, default, critical success factor, value-for-money, integration, methodology, project documentation |
| Subjects: | construction type, strategic management, data collection methods, control systems, dispute resolution, practitioner, project delivery, project planning, contractual arrangements, research methods, management, evaluation, Geography, project controls, conflict resolution, partnership management, organizational analysis, industry analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, administrative law |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Time Control, Value Management, International Construction, Legal Issues, Procurement, Construction Technology, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here