Leung, M-y; Dongyu, C and Liu M.M., A (2014) Impact of values on the learning approaches of Chinese construction students in Hong Kong. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 21(5), pp. 481-504. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to explore the influence of personal values on students' learning behaviours. Hong Kong construction students are often criticized, by both practitioners and educators, as rote learners. To improve students' learning processes, extensive research on a variety of aspects of construction education has been conducted. However, limited attention has been paid to the influence of personal values on students' learning behaviours. The impact of personal value factors on the learning approaches of Chinese construction students in Hong Kong is investigated. Design/methodology/approach - A questionnaire survey was conducted to ethically Chinese construction students in four universities in Hong Kong. A total of 820 questionnaires were distributed and 431 valid returns were collected. Findings - The survey identified six influential values (namely, personal integrity, conservatism, determination, discipline, interpersonal relationships, and achievement), and shows that students who emphasize the virtues of personal integrity, determination, and a positive attitude toward achievement are better able to handle their interpersonal relationships, which will eventually lead them to engage in deep learning. Originality/value - Work to develop appropriate value systems is thus recommended in freshmen courses, as is the use of cooperative learning approaches. Such value systems will have a long-term influence on the learning approaches of construction students.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | education; action learning |
| Index terms: | construction education, methodology, practitioner, questionnaire, personal value, survey, cooperative learning, interpersonal relationship, Hong Kong, action learning, integrity, deep learning |
| Subjects: | learning methods, practitioner, data collection methods, artificial intelligence, curriculum design, Geography, health safety and environment, research methods, behavioral psychology, professional education |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Education, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here