Mahdi, H S and Carmichael, D G (2014) An optimal target cost contract with a risk neutral owner. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 21(5), pp. 586-604. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose - Target cost contracts are commonly used to share the monetary outcome of work or a project. However, discussion is ongoing, as to what constitutes optimal sharing. The purpose of this paper is to examine optimal sharing and derives a result for defined risk assumptions on the owner (risk neutral) and contractor (risk-averse ranging to risk neutral). Design/methodology/approach - The derivation is based on solving a constrained maximization problem using ideas from principal-agent theory. Practitioners were engaged in a designed exercise in order to validate the approach and propositions. The influence of the contractor's level of risk aversion, the cost uncertainty and the contractor's effort effectiveness are examined. Findings - The paper shows that, at the optimum, the sharing ratio between contractor and owner needs to reduce and the fixed fee needs to increase when the contractor becomes more risk-averse, the level of the cost uncertainty increases, or the effectiveness of the contractor effort decreases. Practical implications - The paper's findings provide practitioners with a useful benchmark for outcome sharing in target contracts. Originality/value - Existing work on outcome sharing in target contracts is limited to being qualitative and anecdotal in nature. This paper extends existing knowledge by providing a quantitative treatment of optimal sharing.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction; contracts |
| Index terms: | effectiveness, owner, target cost, exercise, agent, methodology, practitioner, maximization |
| Subjects: | health behaviours and lifestyles, practitioner, economics, performance management, algorithms, research methods, sociology |
| Topics: | Cost Management, Health and Safety, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Digital Applications, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here