A case productivity model for automatic climbing system

Zayed, T and Mohamed, E (2014) A case productivity model for automatic climbing system. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 21(1), pp. 33-50. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose - Tight schedules in high-rise building construction force project managers to use the formwork even in a bad weather condition. Insufficient craning, which is typically the bottleneck in construction activities, and lack of space in confined sites make it hard to install the formwork on the ground. The Automatic Climbing System (ACS), a type of jump forms, solves these problems enabling the formwork to climb in various weather and height conditions. The aim of this paper is to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach - Current research focusses on the ACS, its application, and productivity assessment. Productivity and construction data are collected from a specialized company in such type of forms. A bracket productivity model has been developed to estimate floor construction cycle time and productivity. Findings - Results show that average productivity is four days/floor. The developed model is validated, which shows robust results 97.80 percent. Research limitations/implications - The implementation of the developed models are limited to only two projects. However, the developed models and framework is sound for future improvement. Practical implications - The developed methodology and model play essential roles in decision-making process. Originality/value - The developed methodology and model are beneficial to researchers, practitioners, and planners of construction projects. It provides practitioners with charts that assist in scheduling and managing resources for jump form application. In addition, it provides researchers with a floor cycle time model and framework of implementing jump forms to high-rise buildings.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: buildings; case studies; productivity rate
Index terms: scheduling, weather, high-rise building, practitioner, construction project, methodology, formwork, decision-making process, productivity, construction activity, case study, project manager, implementation, estimate, planner
Subjects: decision analysis, building construction, production management, research methods, management, financial and cost management, construction operations, contractual arrangements, operations research, practitioner, air quality, construction type, profession, data collection methods
Topics: Time Control, Site Management, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Project Management, Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Procurement, Construction Technology, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here