Growing pains: Work-life impacts in small-to-medium sized construction firms

Lingard, H; Turner, M and Charlesworth, S (2015) Growing pains: Work-life impacts in small-to-medium sized construction firms. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 22(3), pp. 312-326. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to compare the quality of work-life experiences of workers in construction firms of differing sizes and explored the work conditions and circumstances that impact upon the work-life experiences of workers in small-to-medium sized enterprises (SMEs) in the Australian construction industry. Design/methodology/approach - Data were collected in two stages. First, data from a sub-set of construction industry workers were extracted from a large scale survey of workers in Victoria, Australia (the VicWAL survey). The survey measured work-life interference using the Australian Work and Life Index (AWALI). Next a subset of survey respondents was identified and interviewed to gain more detailed explanatory information and insight into work-life experiences. Findings - The survey results indicated that respondents who reported working for a construction firm with between 16 and 99 employees reported significantly higher AWALI scores (indicating high work-life interference) than workers in organisations employing 15 or less or more than 100 workers. The follow-up interviews revealed that workers in small construction organisations were managed directly and personally by the business owner/manager and able to access informal work-life supports that were provided on an “as needs” basis. In comparison workers in medium-sized firms perceived higher levels of work pressure and an expectation that work would be prioritised over family life. Research limitations/implications - The research shows that the findings of work-life balance research undertaken in large construction organisations cannot be generalised to SMEs. Organisation size should also be treated as an important variable in work-life balance research in construction. Practical implications - The research suggests that a better understanding of how workers in SME construction firms experience work-life balance is important in the design and development of work-life balance programs. In particular the challenges faced by workers as companies grow from SMEs require careful consideration and management. Originality/value - Previous research has focused on the work-life balance experiences of employees in large construction firms. Little was previously known about the experiences of workers in SME construction firms. The research provides new insight into the work-life experiences of construction workers in organisations of varying sizes.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: organizations; small to medium-sized enterprises; small enterprises; work-life balance; human resource management; employees
Index terms: construction industry, construction worker, work-life balance, construction organization, pain, large construction organization, design and development, owner, Victoria, Australia, methodology, program, medium-sized firm, manager, interview, small enterprise, human resource management, construction firm, survey
Subjects: practitioner, organization, data collection methods, economic analysis, regions and continents, design process, Geography, research methods, software systems, management, industry analysis, sociology, health conditions and diseases
Topics: Human Resources, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here