Shi-Dong, L and Zhao-Dong, X (2024) Logical object structure and system implementation for BIM database in civil infrastructures. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 20(3), pp. 448-470. ISSN 1745-2007
Abstract
Building Information Modeling (BIM) has attracted much attention as a vital information method in civil engineering. BIM data research has become increasingly important with the continuous understanding of BIM. The database designed especially for storing BIM data (IFC data) is called a BIM database. To realize centralized storage and sharing of complex building information, how to design and develop a BIM database will be a hot topic. However, the BIM database designed using an existing logical model (such as a relational model) is unsuitable for storing and managing a large amount of BIM data. To this end, we propose a database logical model for BIM database development called 'logical object structure'. Based on the database design methodology, the logical schema of the BIM database is discussed, and five relation forms are established to describe the feature of engineering information. According to the relation forms, the logical object structure is presented, and the corresponding system implementation process is discussed. Finally, four workloads are set to test the logical object structure. The results show that the logical object structure can well support interactive behaviors of BIM data and provide good performance for the BIM database.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Architecture; Database design; BIM; data structure; civil engineering; complex network; Databases; Data base management systems; Design; Storage; Building information modeling |
| Index terms: | data base management system, workload, database, building information modelling, data structure, implementation, methodology |
| Subjects: | contractual arrangements, data science, research methods, management, information systems, data management |
| Topics: | Human Resources, Digital Applications, Research Practice, Procurement |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here