Rogers, J; Chong, H Y and Preece, C (2015) Adoption of building information modelling technology (BIM): Perspectives from Malaysian engineering consulting services firms. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 22(4), pp. 424-445. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose: Building Information Modelling (BIM) technology has been well received by the Malaysian construction industry, yet the adoption rate is extremely slow. Many areas of adoption issues and know how regarding BM were investigated. However, no prior research has considered the perspective from engineering consulting services (ECS) firms. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to explore the overview and adoption of BM from the perspective of Malaysian ECS firms, with its objectives first, to determine the perceptions, barriers, governmental support and intentions in adopting BM, and second, to identify the key drivers for adopting BM within two years. Design/methodology/approach: The primary data were collected from focus group interview and questionnaire survey to achieve the first objective, and subsequently, the second objective was achieved based on Pearson relationship analysis. Findings: The results show that the firms have a concept of BM that equates to industry authorities' norms; yet the lack of well-trained personnel, guidance and governmental supports were identified as the main barriers to adoption. Nevertheless, the firms were prepared to adopt BM where market demands and competitive advantage were the main drivers to adoption within two years. Originality/value: A different perspective has been highlighted in adoption of BM. It renders a new insight into the effective adoption and use of BM from the ECS firms' perspective.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction management; information technology; information technology strategy; Malaysia; perception; surveys |
| Index terms: | competitive advantage, Malaysia, building information modelling, construction industry, information technology strategy, focus group, interview, personnel, survey, questionnaire, methodology, norms, information technology |
| Subjects: | information systems, industry analysis, sociology, market analysis, data management, Geography, research methods, management, computing systems, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Human Resources, Geographical Context, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here