Risk management implementation in small and medium enterprises in the UK construction industry

Rostami, A; Sommerville, J; Wong, I L and Lee, C (2015) Risk management implementation in small and medium enterprises in the UK construction industry. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 22(1), pp. 91-107. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose - The competition and challenges facing construction firms during the recent recession have brought risk management (RM) to the fore in people’s minds. Examination of the difficulties of implementing RM in small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in the UK construction industry has been relatively untouched. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach - As part of on-going research to facilitate RM processing aimed at improving the competitiveness of SMEs, the difficulties in RM implementation were identified through a literature review of RM implementation in SMEs. Postal questionnaire were sent to SMEs who have experience of construction management. Findings - Of the 153 of SMEs responding, most highlighted that the main difficulty experienced is how to scale RM process to meet their requirements. None of the available standards explain the fundamental principle of applying RM to the situations that SMEs find themselves in. This difficulty is further exacerbated by a lack of management skills and knowledge in the adoption of RM tools or techniques to identify and analyse the business' risks. Originality/value - The identified difficulties can be considered to develop a process to facilitate RM process within SMEs.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction industry; UK; risk management; implementation; small and medium enterprises; risk management tools
Index terms: recession, implementation, construction industry, risk management tool, competitiveness, risk management, literature review, construction firm, methodology, competition, questionnaire
Subjects: risk assessment, data collection methods, organization, contractual arrangements, data analysis and analytics, economic analysis, financial risk, research methods, industry analysis, market analysis
Topics: Procurement, Risk Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Cost Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here