Bakry, I; Moselhi, O and Zayed, T (2016) Optimized scheduling and buffering of repetitive construction projects under uncertainty. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 23(6), pp. 782-800. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose Construction projects are complex projects taking place in dynamic environments, which necessitates accounting for different uncertainties during the planning stage. There is a significant lack of management tools for repetitive projects accounting for uncertainties in the construction environment. The purpose of this paper is to present an algorithm for the optimized scheduling of repetitive construction projects under uncertainty. Design/methodology/approach Fuzzy set theory is utilized to model uncertainties associated with various input parameters. The developed algorithm has two main components: optimization component and buffering component. The optimization component presents a dynamic programming approach that processes fuzzy numbers. The buffering component converts the optimized fuzzy schedule into a deterministic schedule and inserts time buffers to protect the schedule against anticipated delays. Agreement Index (AI) is used to capture the user’s desired level of confidence in the produced schedule while sizing buffers. The algorithm is capable of optimizing for cost or time objectives. An example project drawn from literature is analysed to demonstrate the capabilities of the developed algorithm and to allow comparison of results to those previously generated. Findings Testing the algorithm revealed several findings. Fuzzy numbers can be utilized to capture uncertainty in various inputs without the need for historical data. The modified algorithm is capable of optimizing schedules, for different objectives, under uncertainty. Finally AI can be used to capture users' desired confidence in the final schedule. Originality/value Project planners can utilize this algorithm to optimize repetitive projects schedules, while modelling uncertainty in different input parameters, without the need for relevant historical data.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction management; dynamic programming; fuzzy optimization; linear scheduling; repetitive projects; time buffers |
| Index terms: | complex project, testing, modelling, planner, buffer, dynamic programming, fuzzy set theory, repetitive project, accounting, fuzzy optimization, linear scheduling, construction project, methodology, repetitive construction, scheduling, time buffer |
| Subjects: | operations research, economic analysis, strategic project management, analytical methods, professional practice, profession, building construction, decision-making and optimization, research methods, algorithms, financial risk, production management |
| Topics: | Time Control, Digital Applications, Roles and Professions, Construction Technology, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Project Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here