Bridging the gap: Bringing BIM to construction workers

Bråthen, K and Moum, A (2016) Bridging the gap: Bringing BIM to construction workers. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 23(6), pp. 751-764. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose The majority of research on the implementation and use of Building Information Models (BIM) have focused on building design and pre-construction planning. There is only limited research on the usage of BIM in the construction phase, especially by site workers. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the use of BIM by site workers through so-called “BIM-kiosks”. The kiosks allow workers to access BIM models on-site. The aim of this paper is to take a closer look on the introduction of BIM-kiosks and scrutinize how and for what purpose site workers use the kiosks. Design/methodology/approach This is a single case study of an ongoing real-world construction project. The case study is based on qualitative data which stems from observational studies, interviews as well as document studies. Findings Site workers find opportunities for 3D visualization useful and the BIM models are appraised for efficiently handling complex elements. The findings also indicate that the use of BIM-kiosks lead to a greater level of face-to-face collaboration between workers on-site. This may happen because workers meet, both planned and randomly, to discuss in front of the kiosks while using it for visualization. Research limitations/implications The research is limited to a single case. However, some of the recommendations may be relevant to other projects. In addition, the findings demonstrate some of the potential of using BIM on-site in upcoming construction projects. Originality/value Only a few studies have addressed the use of BIM among site workers. Thus, the findings provide practitioners and researchers insight into how current practices may be improved, as well as areas where more research is needed.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: BIM; implementation; collaboration; visualization; bim-kiosk; construction activities
Index terms: building design, case study, construction activity, pre-construction, implementation, construction phase, construction worker, interview, face, methodology, construction project, collaboration, practitioner, 3D visualization, visualization
Subjects: practitioner, data collection methods, construction operations, contractual arrangements, project delivery, architectural design, psychology, visualization, production management, management, design practice, research methods
Topics: Project Management, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Procurement, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Site Management, Organizational Design
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here