Carbonara, N; Costantino, N and Pellegrino, R (2016) A transaction costs-based model to choose PPP procurement procedures. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 23(4), pp. 491-510. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to develop a decision model for choosing the tendering procedure in PPP that minimizes the transaction costs borne by the public sector. Design/methodology/approach - A conceptual model that relates the procurement procedures described in the EU legal framework to launch PPPs and the transaction costs, considering the level of information managed by each procurement procedure has been developed. The authors use this conceptual model to develop propositions about the impact that specific project- and country-related factors have on the choice of the procurement procedure that minimizes the transaction costs. Findings - The application of the proposed model to the case of the Italian highway “Cispadana” shows its usefulness in orienting the public authority’s choice between the different tendering procedures, taking into account project- and country-related factors. Research limitations/implications - The present study fills the gap existing in the literature on transaction costs of PPP projects and the procurement procedure used to launch those projects by developing a model that relates the level of transaction costs with a set of key factors, namely the level of information managed during the tendering process, the number of bidders, the project size, the project complexity, and the institutional environment. Practical implications - As for practitioners, the main contribution of this study lies in offering a tool for supporting the public authority in the decision-making process about the tendering procedures in PPPs without imposing the selection of a specific procedure. Originality/value - The approach developed provides a new tool to support the contracting authority in the design and choice of the tendering procedures in PPP.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | PPP; public sector; transaction costs; eu legal framework; public procurement procedures; tendering process |
| Index terms: | methodology, practitioner, project complexity, public authority, number of bidders, transaction cost, EU legal framework, tendering process, decision-making process, public sector |
| Subjects: | decision analysis, administrative law, financial analysis, research methods, tendering, organizational theory, bidding, statutes, practitioner |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Cost Management, Research Practice, Project Management, Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Procurement |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here