Elbeltagi, E; Ammar, M; Sanad, H and Kassab, M (2016) Overall multiobjective optimization of construction projects scheduling using particle swarm. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 23(3), pp. 265-282. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose - Developing an optimized project schedule that considers all decision criteria represents a challenge for project managers. The purpose of this paper is to provide a multi-objectives overall optimization model for project scheduling considering time, cost, resources, and cash flow. This development aims to overcome the limitations of optimizing each objective at once resulting of non-overall optimized schedule. Design/methodology/approach - In this paper, a multi-objectives overall optimization model for project scheduling is developed using particle swarm optimization with a new evolutionary strategy based on the compromise solution of the Pareto-front. This model optimizes the most important decisions that affect a given project including: time, cost, resources, and cash flow. The study assumes each activity has different execution methods accompanied by different time, cost, cost distribution pattern, and multiple resource utilization schemes. Findings - Applying the developed model to schedule a real-life case study project proves that the proposed model is valid in modeling real-life construction projects and gives important results for schedulers and project managers. The proposed model is expected to help construction managers and decision makers in successfully completing the project on time and reduced budget by utilizing the available information and resources. Originality/value - The paper presented a novel model that has four main characteristics: it produces an optimized schedule considering time, cost, resources, and cash flow simultaneously; it incorporates a powerful particle swarm optimization technique to search for the optimum schedule; it applies multi-objectives optimization rather than single-objective and it uses a unique Pareto-compromise solution to drive the fitness calculations of the evolutionary process.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | optimization techniques; integration; construction management; construction; financial performance; critical path analysis |
| Index terms: | case study, project manager, resource utilization, optimization technique, modelling, critical path analysis, decision criteria, strategy, project scheduling, scheduling, scheduler, cash flow, construction manager, construction project, financial performance, integration, methodology |
| Subjects: | analytical methods, site logistics, operations research, practitioner, data collection methods, profession, organizational analysis, project controls, decision analysis, production management, financial management, management, algorithms, business analysis, research methods |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Project Management, Research Practice, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Digital Applications, Site Management, Organizational Design, Time Control |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here