Kog, F and Yaman, H (2016) A multi-agent systems-based contractor pre-qualification model. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 23(6), pp. 709-726. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose The selection of the contractor, as a main participant of a construction project, is the most important and challenging decision process for a client. The purpose of this paper is to propose a multi-agent systems (MAS)-based contractor pre-qualification (CP) model for the construction sector in the frame of the tender management system. Design/methodology/approach The meta-classification and analysis study of the existing literature on CP, contractor selection and criteria weighting issues, which examines the current and important CP criteria, other than price, is introduced structurally. A quantitative survey, which is carried out to estimate initial weightings of the identified criteria, is overviewed. MAS are used to model the pre-qualification process and workflows are shown in Petri nets formalism. A user-friendly prototype program is created in order to simulate the tendering process. In addition, a real case regarding the construction work in Turkey is analyzed. Findings There is a lack of non-human-driven solutions and automation in CP and in the selection problem. The proposed model simulates the pre-qualification process and provides consistent results. Research limitations/implications The meta-classification study consists of only peer-reviewed papers between 1992 and 2013 and the quantitative survey initiates the perspectives of the actors of Turkish construction sector. Only the traditional project delivery method is selected for the proposed model, that is other delivery methods such as design/build, project management, etc., are not considered. Open, selective limited and negotiated tendering processes are examined in the study and the direct supply is not considered in the scope. Practical implications The implications will help to provide an objective CP and selection process and to prevent the delays, costs and other troubles, which are caused by the false selection of a contractor. Originality/value Automation and simulation in the pre-qualification and the selection of the contractor with a non-human-driven intelligent solution ease the decision processes of clients in terms of cost, time and quality.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | decision support systems; contractor pre-qualification; contractor selection; criteria evaluation; multi-agent systems; tender management system |
| Index terms: | delivery method, decision process, contractor selection, tendering process, Turkey, estimate, automation, project delivery, project management, pre-qualification, construction work, prototype, contractor pre-qualification, survey, decision support, workflow, construction sector, tender management system, methodology, construction project, criteria evaluation, program, multi-agent system |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, operations management, modelling and simulation, artificial intelligence, financial and cost management, project delivery, management, research methods, software systems, tendering, production management, automation and robotics, Geography, project management theory and practice, delivery method, decision analysis, industry analysis |
| Topics: | Risk Management, Procurement, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Project Management, Research Practice, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here