Design engineers' perception of health and safety and its impact in the design process

Morrow, S; Hare, B and Cameron, I (2016) Design engineers' perception of health and safety and its impact in the design process. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 23(1), pp. 40-59. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to consider design engineers' perception of health and safety and its impact on their behaviour during design activity. The study presents three types of design engineers each, exhibiting particular tendencies when faced with health and safety considerations during design. The discovery of these tendencies pose important implications for education and professional institutions and practical measures are suggested to help design engineers manage their tendencies to be more conducive to ensuring improved health and safety performance. Design/methodology/approach - An exploratory design method was used - grounded theory, to include 13, in-depth, one-to-one interviews with design engineers, representing junior staff, middle and senior management. Findings - The paper provides empirical insights about how designers think and behave when asked to consider health and safety issues during the design process. It identifies three group types of designers: doers, receivers and givers, who will exhibit their particular tendencies based on how they view and understand the term health and safety. Research limitations/implications - The data obtained were from design engineers only, and therefore the research results may lack generalisability. Therefore, researchers are encouraged to test the proposed propositions. Practical implications - The paper includes implications for those involved in the creation and development of designers e.g., educators and professional bodies. The data forms the basis for helping designers to manage their perceptions towards the term health and safety and thus, their tendencies exhibited in their behaviour. Originality/value - This paper contributes to new understanding of designers' behaviour and considers the significance of how designers' views of health and safety will influence their behaviour.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: perception; health and safety; education; grounded theory; design behaviour; designers
Index terms: health and safety, design method, interview, methodology, design behaviour, designer, health and safety issues, grounded theory, design process, engineer
Subjects: health safety and environment, profession, theoretical framing, data collection methods, occupational health and safety management, cognitive psychology, design methods, research methods
Topics: Research Practice, Health and Safety, Design Practice, Roles and Professions
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here