Zuppa, D; Olbina, S and Issa, R (2016) Perceptions of trust in the US construction industry. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 23(2), pp. 211-236. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to obtain an understanding of the perception of trust between US construction contracting parties. The research objectives were to identify the factors on construction projects that impact such trust and to identify how trust affects factors on construction project. Design/methodology/approach - A survey of construction professionals working for the Engineering News Record’s Top 400 US contractors was conducted. Findings - The findings showed that paying on time, competency, reliability and effective collaboration were the most important factors that affected contextual conditions trustworthiness. Factors perceived to strengthen trust included face-to-face communication, electronic documents, and timely and adequate responses to requests for information. The presence of construction managers on construction projects, and corrective changes orders from neutral third parties were perceived to weaken trust. Trust was perceived to assist leadership, team building, communication and information sharing. Originality/value - The main contribution of this study is the discovery of additional factors that impact trust and factors that require trust and that were not identified by previous researchers.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | communications; USA; construction management; contracting parties; effect of trust; trust factors |
| Index terms: | team building, trust factor, contracting party, construction professional, information sharing, presence, construction industry, face, survey, effect of trust, collaboration, construction project, methodology, construction manager, documents |
| Subjects: | industry analysis, sociology, professional development, production management, research methods, data exchange, management, environmental science, psychology, practitioner, data collection methods, profession |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Project Management, Information Management, Roles and Professions, Sustainability, Digital Applications, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here