Challenges and barriers to establishing infrastructure asset management: A comparative study between Libya and the USA

Beitelmal, W; Molenaar, K R; Javernick-Will, A and Pellicer, E (2017) Challenges and barriers to establishing infrastructure asset management: A comparative study between Libya and the USA. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(6), pp. 1184-1202. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose The increased need for, and maintenance of, infrastructure creates challenges for all agencies that manage infrastructure assets. To assist with these challenges, agencies implement asset management systems. The purpose of this paper is to investigate and compare the importance of barriers faced by agencies establishing transportation asset management systems in the USA and Libya to contrast a case of a developed and developing country. Design/methodology/approach A literature review identified 28 potential barriers for implementing an asset management system. Practitioners who participate in decision-making processes in each country were asked to rate the importance of each barrier in an online survey questionnaire. Descriptive statistics, Kendall Concordance W., and Mann-Whitney are used to analyze the collected data. Findings Through an analysis of 61 completed questionnaires, 14 barriers were identified as important by both the US and Libyan practitioners. A total of 11 additional barriers, primarily in the areas of political and regulatory obstacles, were determined to be important only for Libya. These 11 barriers provide reasonable insights into asset management systems' barriers for developing countries. Practical implications The list of barriers identified from this research will assist decision makers to address and overcome these barriers when implementing asset management systems in their specific organizational and country conditions. Originality/value The research identified standard barriers to implementing asset management systems and identified barriers that were specific to the country context, such as political and regulatory barriers in Libya. When viewed with the asset management literature, the results show broad applicability of some asset management barriers and the need to contextualize to country context (e.g. developing countries) for other barriers.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: infrastructure; barriers; implementation; questionnaire; assets management; developing and developed country
Index terms: comparative study, implementation, statistics, decision-making process, practitioner, questionnaire, methodology, Libya, agency, developing and developed country, developing country, infrastructure asset management, survey, asset management, literature review
Subjects: decision analysis, sociology, asset management, development economics, Geography, research methods, economic development, contractual arrangements, data analysis and analytics, practitioner, mathematical modelling, research design and methodology, data collection methods
Topics: Research Practice, Geographical Context, Business Strategy, Procurement, Risk Management, Roles and Professions, International Construction
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here