Dada, J O (2017) An appraisal of paradigm shifts required of competence of the Nigerian quantity surveyors. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(6), pp. 1269-1280. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the competence of Nigerian quantity surveyors with a view to identify and assess required areas of interest. Design/methodology/approach A structured questionnaire was administered among relevant groups of respondent (quantity surveyors, architects, engineers, builders and clients) in Nigeria. The respondents were asked to give rating, on a five-point Likert scale, on the required competencies (variables) expected of Nigerian quantity surveyors. A mean item score statistical analysis was used to rank the variables and compare them within the different groups. The analysis was undertaken using the Statistical Packages for Social Science tool. In exploring the underlying relationship among the competence requirement, factor analysis statistical technique was used to categorize them into key components. Findings The results of the study identified required competencies and factorized them into three components. These are as follows: procurement and value management; commercial management; and communication and entrepreneurship. Originality/value The findings provide insight into the competencies needed to be incorporated and/or intensified in the training of quantity surveyors in Nigeria.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | training; Nigeria; appraisal; paradigm shift; quantity surveyor; required competencies |
| Index terms: | engineer, Nigeria, statistical analysis, quantity surveying, package, required competency, paradigm, social science, factor analysis, entrepreneurship, value management, architect, builder, appraisal, competence, methodology, questionnaire, Likert scale |
| Subjects: | statistical analysis, research methods, management, theoretical framing, education and knowledge transfer, factor and component analysis, professional development, personnel development, Geography, data science, contractual arrangements, business, data collection methods, profession, practitioner |
| Topics: | Value Management, Human Resources, Roles and Professions, Procurement, Business Strategy, Information Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here