Daniel, E I; Pasquire, C; Dickens, G and Ballard, H G (2017) The relationship between the last planner® system and collaborative planning practice in UK construction. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(3), pp. 407-425. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
This paper discusses the practice of collaborative planning (CP) for construction project delivery in UK suggesting that the practice of CP should be extended to include elements of the global last planner system for reaping greater benefits.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | UK; construction planning; collaborative planning; construction sector; last planner system; production planning and management |
| Index terms: | construction project delivery, production planning, collaborative planning, construction sector, last planner system, construction planning, planner |
| Subjects: | profession, urban planning, construction planning, project delivery, project controls, industry analysis |
| Topics: | Site Management, Time Control, Project Management, Research Practice, Governance, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here