de Paula, N; Arditi, D and Melhado, S (2017) Managing sustainability efforts in building design, construction, consulting, and facility management firms. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(6), pp. 1040-1050. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate sustainability efforts in the managerial processes of design, consulting, construction, and facility management firms and to identify the differences between these parties. Design/methodology/approach A questionnaire survey was administered to design, consulting, construction, and facility management firms in the USA to seek information about the state of sustainability efforts in these firms relative to strategic planning, marketing, business management, financial management, organizational structure, and people management. χ2 tests were performed on the data collected to determine if statistically significant differences exist between the project participants relative to sustainability efforts. Findings Sustainability efforts are related to a firm’s strategic positioning, reputation and experience, and hiring/employment policies, while profit margins are not higher in sustainable projects compared to traditional projects. Statistically significant differences were detected in three of the six items investigated, indicating conflicting interests among the parties. Research limitations/implications The study’s limitation is that it is limited to sustainability efforts in the USA. Practical implications It is concluded that sustainability demands have changed the nature of design, construction, and operation of buildings in ways that deserve special attention on the part of all parties involved. Originality/value The firms that participate in building construction projects need to adopt management practices that accommodate sustainable building design, construction, and operation in order to remain competitive in a market where demand for environmental sustainability has grown significantly in recent years.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction firm; management; consultant firm; design firm; facility management firm; sustainability demands |
| Index terms: | questionnaire, facility management firm, methodology, management practice, sustainable building design, business management, environmental sustainability, sustainability demand, organizational structure, profit, construction firm, survey, building construction, marketing, strategic planning, design firm, financial management, building design, consultant firm, employment |
| Subjects: | practitioner, data collection methods, organization, business, energy systems, architectural design, economic analysis, environmental resource management, health safety and environment, management, research methods, sociology, building construction |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Construction Technology, Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Human Resources, Design Practice, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here