Jaeger, M; Yu, G and Adair, D (2017) Organisational culture of Chinese construction organisations in Kuwait. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(6), pp. 1051-1066. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to identify evidence for, first, the existence and nature of organisational culture of Chinese construction organisations in Kuwait, second, the differences and similarities when comparing with construction organisations in China and, third, the differences and similarities when comparing with construction organisations within the countries of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC). Design/methodology/approach Data were collected through researcher administered survey instruments from 33 Chinese construction project managers in Kuwait, then were analysed by using the Organisational Culture Assessment Instrument and empirical statistics. Findings The Hierarchy culture was found to be dominant. It matches the predominant organisational culture among construction organisations in China, but is different from the blend of Hierarchy and Group culture of construction organisations in the GCC. Originality/value Chinese construction organisations in Kuwait were found to foster an organisational culture that is close to Chinese construction organisations in China regarding Hierarchy, Market and Adhocracy culture, but closer to the GCC construction organisations regarding the Group culture. Practitioners need to be aware of the differences and similarities identified in order to manage cultural diversity effectively.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | China; organizational culture; Kuwait; Gulf cooperation council; construction organization; OCAI |
| Index terms: | manager, survey, practitioner, evidence, Kuwait, methodology, construction project, Gulf cooperation council, organizational culture, China, construction organization, statistics |
| Subjects: | institutional frameworks, practitioner, evaluation and assessment methods, data collection methods, organization, mathematical modelling, sociology, Geography, production management, research methods |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Governance, Business Strategy, Geographical Context, Project Management, Research Practice, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here