Kalutara, P; Zhang, G; Setunge, S and Wakefield, R (2017) Factors that influence Australian community buildings' sustainable management. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(1), pp. 94-117. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose Australia has a huge stock of community buildings built up over decades. Their replacements consume a large sum of money from country’s economy which has called for a strategy for their sustainable management. For this, a comprehensive decision-making structure is an utmost requirement. The purpose of this paper is to capture their sustainable management from four aspects, i.e. environmental, economic, social and functional. Design/methodology/approach The design process follows an extensive review of environmental and life cycle assessments and company context documents. Extracted factors are tailored to community buildings management following expert consultation. However, the resulted list of factors is extremely large, and “factor analysis” technique is used to group the factors. For this, an industry-wide questionnaire across Australian local councils is employed to solicit opinions of the list of factors. Findings The analysis has pinpointed 18 key parameters (criteria) to represent all four aspects. This paper presents the preliminary findings of the factors and the analysis results based on the questionnaire responses. Practical implications The final decision-making structure incorporates all these aspects and criteria. This can be used to develop a decision-making model which produces a sustainability index for building components. Asset managers can mainly use the sustainability index to prioritise their maintenance activities and eventually, to find out cost-optimisation options for them. Originality/value Most notably, this is the first study to apply all four sustainability aspects (environmental, economic, social and functional) to develop a decision-making structure for Australian community buildings' sustainable management.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | decision making; life cycle assessment; factor analysis; sustainable management; environmental assessment; sustainability aspects |
| Index terms: | life cycle assessment, strategy, manager, design process, environmental assessment, replacement, building component, methodology, decision-making, questionnaire, documents, sustainable management, Australia, sustainability aspect, option, factor analysis |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, practitioner, design methods, environmental impact, materials science, research methods, architectural elements, management, sustainability assessment, professional development, health safety and environment, Geography, decision analysis, statistical analysis |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here