Ritson, N H; Wilson, M M J and Cohen, D A (2017) Managing engineering contractors in the UK petrochemicals industry. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(6), pp. 1067-1080. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate, at the industry level, the modes of governance used by multinational companies in the UK petrochemical industry to outsource maintenance activities to engineering contractors. The study focusses on a form of novel governance structure called an Employer Panel (EP). Design/methodology/approach The study applies an inductive case study method to investigate the contractor governance mechanisms in 19 out of the 20 major petrochemical instillations located in the UK. Data included interviews, documentary and secondary evidence gathered from the cases and also industry bodies. Findings The study uncovered three distinct types of governance mode: market, managing contractor, and EP of contractors. The latter relies on the governance process of “mandated collaboration” to coordinate. Research limitations/implications The main limitation is the focus on a particular industry, albeit an important one. The research implications include extending the empirical research into other sectors which use on-site contracted maintenance such as ship and aircraft manufacturing. Practical implications The EP structure with its mandated collaboration process is of value to managers of contractual relationships as it gives insights into coordinative process and it may provide an alternative model for managing outsourcing relationships. Social implications The mandated collaborative process requires clients to engage its contractors in longer term relationships, thus increasing corporate social responsibility and providing wider job security for contractor employees. Originality/value The EP mode, as far as can be ascertained, has not been addressed in the literature before.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | outsourcing; governance; maintenance; employer panel; engineering contractors; mandated collaboration |
| Index terms: | mandated collaboration, corporate social responsibility, engineering contractor, governance, outsourcing, case study, methodology, contractual relationship, evidence, interview, manager |
| Subjects: | evaluation and assessment methods, data collection methods, contractual relationship, business, practitioner, management, research methods, health safety and environment, firms |
| Topics: | Procurement, Governance, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Contract Administration |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here