Managing housing needs of post conflict housing reconstruction: Sri Lankan perspective

Seneviratne, K; Amaratunga, D and Haigh, R (2017) Managing housing needs of post conflict housing reconstruction: Sri Lankan perspective. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(2), pp. 275-288. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

The theoretical framework of managing housing needs effectively in post conflict housing reconstruction includes the relevant challenges, contributing factors, strategies, gaps and recommendations in addressing accessibility, habitability, affordability, location, facilities, cultural consideration and security of land tenure in the reconstruction.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: housing; customer satisfaction; supervision; construction management; procurement; conflict resolution
Index terms: supervision, tenure, housing reconstruction, land, customer satisfaction, conflict resolution, accessibility, reconstruction, habitability, housing, affordability, housing need, strategy
Subjects: construction type, control systems, real estate economics, economic analysis, management, inclusive design, post-disaster and reconstruction, service delivery, housing and residential development, conflict resolution, building performance, building construction
Topics: Engineering Principles, Project Management, Business Strategy, Construction Technology, Stakeholder Management, Urban Studies, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here