Teo, A L E; Ofori, G; Tjandra, I and Kim, H (2017) Framework for productivity and safety enhancement system using BIM in Singapore. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(6), pp. 1350-1371. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose Despite recognition of its importance to Singapore’s economy, the construction industry is plagued by poor safety and productivity performance. Improvement efforts by the government and industry have yielded little results. The purpose of this paper is to propose a framework for developing a productivity and safety monitoring system using Building Information Modelling (BIM). Design/methodology/approach The framework, Intelligent Productivity and Safety System (IPASS), takes advantage of mandatory requirements for building plans to be submitted for approval in Singapore in BIM format. IPASS is based on a study comprising interviews and a questionnaire-based survey. It uses BIM to integrate buildable design, prevention and control of hazards, and safety assessment. Findings The authors illustrate a development of IPASS capable of generating productivity and safety scores for construction projects by analysing BIM model information. Research limitations/implications The paper demonstrates that BIM can be used to monitor productivity and safety as a project progresses, and help to enhance performance under the two parameters. Practical implications IPASS enables collaboration among project stakeholders as they can base their work on analysis of productivity and safety performance before projects start, and as they progress. It is suggested that the BIM model submitted to the authorities should be used for the IPASS application. Originality/value IPASS has rule-checking, hazards identification and quality checking capabilities. It is able to identify hazards and risks with the rule-checking capabilities. IPASS enables practitioners to check mistakes and the rationality of a design. It helps to mitigate risks as there are built-in safety measures/controls rules to overcome the problems caused by design deficiency, wrong-material-choice, and more.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | productivity; BIM; safety; system |
| Index terms: | productivity, safety measures, building information modelling, Singapore, construction industry, prevention, monitoring, survey, rationality, interview, approval, safety performance, questionnaire, practitioner, project stakeholder, collaboration, construction project, methodology |
| Subjects: | contractual role, data collection methods, practitioner, control systems, management, research methods, decision-making and reasoning, health safety and environment, Geography, production management, financial risk, occupational health and safety management, sociology, industry analysis, information systems |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Contract Administration, Organizational Design, Site Management, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Health and Safety, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Project Management, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here