Wang, C; Li, B; Li, B and Baldwin, A (2017) Case study of "project controlling" on a large HOPSCA project in China. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(6), pp. 862-874. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to present a detailed case study on the methods and organisational structure used for controlling the time schedule for a large and complex project. The paper discusses the use of “project controlling”, a term used to describe project control by a third-party organisation. Design/methodology/approach The researchers used action research to collect data for the case study. A member of the research team was a “participant-observer” on the project on a day-to-day basis for a period of 18 months collecting and analysing data which were subsequently analysed by a mixed methods approach. Findings The use of a “Project Controlling Unit” operated by an independent adviser organisation has significant advantages over traditional methods. It can provide timely, consolidated, independent guidance to the client and assistance to other participating organisations. Research limitations/implications The research has confirmed the effectiveness of the method on the project under study. Practical implications The findings provide guidance for enhanced project control on large complex infrastructural projects that will be of interest to other researchers, other clients and other construction organisations both within China and internationally. Social implications Organisations that seek to develop Project Controlling Units to implement the methods described in this paper will need to review their recruitment and training strategies to ensure that appropriate and experienced staffs are engaged. Originality/value The paper extends the knowledge relating to “project controlling” method. The findings provide additional insights to progress reporting and the management of construction production on HOPSCA and other large infrastructural projects.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | project management; scheduling; production planning and control; HOPSCA; organization and methods; project controlling |
| Index terms: | action research, scheduling, organizational structure, infrastructural project, production planning, strategy, methodology, project controlling, China, mixed method, case study, construction organization, effectiveness, construction production, project control, recruitment, project management, complex project |
| Subjects: | operations management, operations research, project delivery, strategic project management, data collection methods, organization, control systems, sociology, management, research methods, performance management, Geography, project management theory and practice, infrastructure engineering |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Site Management, Time Control, Human Resources, Quality Management, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Project Management, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here