Tunji-Olayeni, P F; Mosaku, T O; Fagbenle, O I and Amusan, L M (2016) Project management competencies of indigenous contractors in Nigeria. African Journal of Built Environment Research, 1(1), pp. 49-58. ISSN 2414-0236
Abstract
All over the world, governments are talking about reducing spending of capital and recurrent expenditures. Capital expenditures cover cost for major projects such as infrastructure. Moreover, the wealth and worth of a nation is a function of the availability and quality of its infrastructure. It has been noted that indigenous construction firms do not represent a strong source of competition. Consequently, most construction markets in Africa are dominated by expatriates. Governments of most African countries pay huge amount of money to expatriates because of deficiencies in indigenous capacity. This study therefore, identifies and analyses project management competencies required by indigenous construction firms. A quantitative research method was adopted for the study and 72 questionnaires were distributed to indigenous construction firms in Lagos and Abuja, Nigeria. This study revealed cost management, site management, and time management as the most critical project management competencies of indigenous contractors surveyed. The study further revealed that the critical PM competencies of contractors surveyed are hard/technical competencies. The study recommends that indigenous contractors should in addition to hard competencies develop soft/personal competencies which can also facilitate the achievement of project success.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | competencies; construction market; contractor; Nigeria; project management; questionnaire survey |
| Index terms: | site management, capital expenditure, Lagos, competition, questionnaire, project management, Abuja, construction market, time management, indigenous construction firm, quantitative research, project success, Africa, project management competency, Nigeria, survey, cost management, major project |
| Subjects: | accounting and finance, Geography, project management theory and practice, professional development, project controls, market analysis, data collection methods, construction operations, data analysis and analytics, economic analysis, regions and continents, strategic project management |
| Topics: | Site Management, Time Control, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Information Management, Project Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here