Jacob, J and Varghese, K (2018) A framework for ad hoc information management for the building design process. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 25(8), pp. 1034-1052. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose: The building design processes today are complex, involving many disciplines and issues like collaboration, concurrency and collocation. Several studies have focused on understanding and modeling formal information exchange in these processes. Few past studies have also identified the importance of informal information exchanges in the design process and proposed passive solutions for facilitating this exchange. The purpose of this paper is to term the informal information as ad hoc information and explores if components of ad hoc information exchanges can be actively managed. Design/methodology/approach: An MDM-based framework integrating product, process and people dependencies is proposed and a prototype platform to implement this framework is developed. The demonstration on the usage of this platform to identify information paths during collaboration and hence manage ad hoc information exchanges is presented through an example problem. Findings: Based on the effectiveness of the prototype platform in identifying information paths for design queries, it is concluded that the proposed framework is useful for actively managing some components of ad hoc information exchange. Originality/value: This research enables the design manager/participants to make a more informed decision on requesting and releasing design information.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building information modelling; construction planning; design management |
| Index terms: | effectiveness, modelling, construction planning, building information modelling, building design, platform, design management, methodology, collaboration, design manager, design process, prototype, information exchange |
| Subjects: | modelling and simulation, data science, construction planning, architectural design, analytical methods, profession, design methods, information systems, management, performance management, research methods, digital design, design process |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Site Management, Quality Management, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Roles and Professions, Engineering Principles, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here