Reducing construction material cost by optimizing buy-in decision that accounts the flexibility of non-critical activities

Meng, J; Yan, J; Xue, B; Fu, J and He, N (2018) Reducing construction material cost by optimizing buy-in decision that accounts the flexibility of non-critical activities. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 25(8), pp. 1092-1108. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose: The goal of making buy-in decisions is to purchase materials at the right time with the required quantity and a minimum material cost (MC). To help achieve this goal, the purpose of this paper is to find a way of optimizing the buy-in decision with the consideration of flexible starting date of non-critical activities which makes daily demand adjustable. Design/methodology/approach: First, a specific algorithm is developed to calculate a series of demand combinations modeling daily material demand for all the possible start dates. Second, future material prices are predicted by applying artificial neural network. Third, the demand combinations and predicted prices are used to generate an optimal buy-in decision. Findings: By comparing MC in situation when non-critical activities always start at the earliest date to that in situations when the starting date is flexible, it is found that making material buy-in decision with the consideration of the flexibility usually helps reduce MC. Originality/value: In this paper, a material buy-in decision-making method that accounts non-critical activities' flexible starting date is proposed. A ternary cycle algorithm is developed to calculate demand combinations. The results that making material buy-in decision considering non-critical activities' flexible starting date can reduce MC in most times indicates that contractors may consider non-critical activities' flexibility a part of the buy-in decision-making process, so as to achieve an MC decrease and profit increase.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction planning; optimization; supply chain management
Index terms: decision-making process, construction planning, modelling, construction material, profit, artificial neural network, methodology, decision-making
Subjects: building materials, modelling and simulation, analytical methods, economic analysis, construction planning, research methods, decision analysis
Topics: Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Risk Management, Site Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here