State-of-practice for risk-based quality assurance in state departments of transportation

Oechler, E; Molenaar, K R; Hallowell, M and Scott, S (2018) State-of-practice for risk-based quality assurance in state departments of transportation. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 25(7), pp. 958-970. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose: Selecting an optimal quality assurance (QA) process can have significant implications on the long-term durability and lifecycle costs of transportation projects. Currently, the approaches used by state departments of transportation (DOTs) to optimize QA are undocumented and the impact of project-specific factors are unknown. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach: State-of-practice was documented via a review of DOT guidance documents, standard specifications and minimum sampling and testing requirements; a survey of 58 state DOT representatives; and interviews with eight DOTs. Findings: DOT approaches to QA management are very diverse but can be organized into five levels that range from ad hoc visual inspection of materials to DOT-managed sampling and testing. Project size, location and complexity have strong influence on the selection of a QA approach, but DOT demographics and project delivery method are less significant. Practical implications: Present approaches to the selection of a QA approach are generally informal, subjective and do not involve formal risk analyses. A data-driven approach for transportation projects is clearly needed. Originality/value: Understanding how state DOTs approach QA method selection will serve as a foundation for new methods of QA optimization.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction; construction materials; optimization techniques; quality assessment; quality management; surveys
Index terms: quality assurance, survey, visual inspection, transportation project, quality assessment, specification, interview, complexity, risk analysis, documents, methodology, durability, optimization technique, project delivery, testing, quality management, demographics, lifecycle, sampling, construction material
Subjects: data collection methods, building materials, material degradation and durability, project delivery, professional practice, research methods, algorithms, professional development, contractual condition, demography, systems engineering, environmental hazards, quality assurance, infrastructure and transport systems
Topics: Contract Administration, Digital Applications, Urban Studies, Quality Management, Procurement, Sustainability, Research Practice, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Construction Materials
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here