Prakash, A and Phadtare, M (2018) Service quality for architects: Scale development and validation. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 25(5), pp. 670-686. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to develop and explain an empirically validated scale to measure service quality for architects in India. Design/methodology/approach: This study applies a systematic procedure for development of a psychometric scale in three phases. Phase 1 includes item generation and selection through review of literature and expert opinion. Phase 2 comprises scale refinement using item analysis and exploratory factor analysis. Phase 3 applies confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) for establishing convergent, discriminant and nomological validity. This study has involved 15 expert participants in Phase 1 and sought participation from 250 respondents using an online questionnaire in two other independent phases. Findings: The findings of the empirical study resulted in the development of a 22-item scale that measures the constructs such as design quality, project administration quality, communication quality, relationship quality and dependability quality. Research limitations/implications: This study has developed a context-specific psychometric scale of service quality for architects in India using snowball sampling. Although this study identified five valid service quality factors, the classified information relating to the formation of expectations was not collected. Practical implications: This reliable and valid scale would be helpful for architects to measure the level of service quality in enhancing business performance. This study has established that service quality for architects is achieved only when the perceived benefits are available from the aspects like design, project administration, communication, relationship and dependability. Social implications: This study can facilitate an architect interested in opportunities relating to contracting, consulting and engineering to explore possibilities of higher fees from clients. Originality/value: This study is an original attempt in developing a validated tool to measure service quality of architects in India.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | architecture; design; integrated practice; management |
| Index terms: | empirical study, sampling, architect, India, project administration, level of service, scale development, validity, integrated practice, methodology, validation, questionnaire, business performance, service quality, exploratory factor analysis, design quality, confirmatory factor analysis |
| Subjects: | professional practice, administration, profession, evaluation and assessment methods, data collection methods, statistical analysis, measurement and scaling, Geography, professional development, performance measurement, management, research methods |
| Topics: | Geographical Context, Project Management, Research Practice, Information Management, Business Strategy, Roles and Professions, Quality Management, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here