An assessment of multi-skilling in addressing skills shortage in Nigerian construction firms

AbdulAzeez, A D; Etubi, U and Umar, B (2019) An assessment of multi-skilling in addressing skills shortage in Nigerian construction firms. African Journal of Built Environment Research, 3(1), pp. 1-13. ISSN 2414-0236

Abstract

The construction industry in Nigeria is largely driven by activities of skilled labour or craftsmen as most of the construction activities are carried out manually. However, Nigerian building construction firms are challenged by a shortage of skilled manpower. This study assessed multi-skilling practice in building construction with a view to bridge skills shortage in the building construction firms. This study identified specific skills shortage and responsible factors, assessed the practice of multi-skilling, identified the impact of multi-skilling, identified impediments and ways of enhancing multi-skilling in the building construction firms. The study utilized a population of 170 building construction firms registered in Abuja with updated remittance to the Industrial Training Fund (ITF). Simple random sampling was used in selecting 140 sampled firms. Two sets of questionnaires were administered to the most senior professional and craftsman in each of the 140 firms sampled. Data obtained was analysed with statistical tools: means, percentages, and standard deviation and results were presented in charts and tables. The major findings in this study revealed that respondents (professionals and craftsmen) admitted shortage of masonry, plumbing, and painting skills. "Poor apprenticeship schemes" was unanimously agreed by respondents to be the most important factor responsible for skills shortage with mean of 3.94 and 3.74 as ranked by professionals and craftsmen respectively. The study also revealed that multi-skilling is only slightly (48%) practiced among professionals while some of the craftsmen possess and practice skills other than their traditional area of competence. The study showed that professionals and craftsmen admitted that "workforce saving" (mean = 3.83 and mean = 4.13 respectively) is the most important impact of multi-skilling. Findings on impediments to multi-skilling revealed that "high cost of training" (mean = 3.78) and "complexity of management" (mean = 3.51) are the major impediments. "training and retraining of workers" (mean = 4.14) and "management's decision to multi-skill" (mean = 3.90) were ranked highest as ways of enhancing the practice of multi-skilling. The research therefore concludes that "workforce saving" attribute of the concept of multi-skilling is an antidote to skills shortage in the building construction industry in Nigeria. Therefore, study recommends that construction firms should adopt multi-skilling with sustainable implementation strategies in order to bridge skills shortage.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: craftsmen; construction firms; manpower; multi-skilling; Nigeria; professional; questionnaire survey; skilled labour
Index terms: skilled labour, strategy, deviation, multi-skilling, construction activity, building construction, Nigeria, survey, construction firm, population, competence, apprenticeship, sampling, questionnaire, craft worker, implementation, plumbing, construction industry, Abuja, complexity
Subjects: practitioner, data collection methods, flexibility, mechanical systems, organization, contractual arrangements, construction operations, financial and cost management, Geography, personnel development, management, industry analysis, systems engineering, demography, professional education, building construction
Topics: Roles and Professions, Procurement, Construction Technology, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Site Management, Education, Design Practice, Urban Studies, Human Resources
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here