AlShamisi, H A; Chinyio, E; Ankrah, N; Kpamma, Z E; Mushatat, S; Oloke, D and Wilson, P (2019) Prevalence of leadership and management features amongst construction project managers in the UAE. African Journal of Built Environment Research, 3(1), pp. 41-55. ISSN 2414-0236
Abstract
Leaders and managers are different, and their traits are also different. Construction project managers (CPMs), as leaders, often provide vision and direction on how projects should be executed. CPMs, as managers, also plan and control the delivery of projects. CPMs are, therefore, expected to have both leadership and management abilities. Little attention has, however, been paid to the relative prevalence of the management and leadership attributes among CPMs. This research, thus, aimed at investigating the relative prevalence of the leadership and management traits of CPMs. The research was undertaken in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) where selected CPMs were asked to evaluate themselves in terms of 13 comparative "leadership versus management" features. Analysis of the data collected by means of descriptive and inferential statistics generally showed an overwhelming dominance of the leadership traits over their management counterparts. The respondents in this regard, felt that they possessed leadership qualities such as being creative, inspiring, trusting and passionate. This suggests that more of the CPMs who were surveyed have prevalent leadership traits. The study, which has identified current CPMs who are potential leaders, contributes to knowledge on how contractors and other organisations can systematically identify potential leaders of their entities.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | focus group; leadership; project management; questionnaire survey; self-evaluation; skills; UAE |
| Index terms: | self-evaluation, survey, manager, focus group, United Arab Emirates, statistics, project management, construction project, questionnaire |
| Subjects: | practitioner, data collection methods, mathematical modelling, evaluation methods, Geography, production management, project management theory and practice |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Project Management, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here