Dynamic framework transfer model for public-private partnerships: Lessons from a China water sector case study

Bao, F; Chen, C; Chan, A P C; Martek, I and Shrestha, A (2019) Dynamic framework transfer model for public-private partnerships: Lessons from a China water sector case study. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(7), pp. 1218-1239. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose: Public–private partnerships (PPPs) have emerged in developing countries, such as China, as a ubiquitous means by which government procures needed infrastructure. In this regard, they have been much studied. However, due to their long concession period, running into decades, few have run their full course into the transfer phase (TP) in which the PPP concession reverts from the private entity back to the public. In China, this is about to change as many PPPs approach their TP. Hence, the purpose of this paper is to comprehensively investigate the TP of PPPs in China. Design/methodology/approach: A three-part methodology was undertaken to achieve the research purpose. Extensive literature review was first conducted to analyze the status quo of the transfer management regime in China, followed by the identification of critical challenges and the exploration of solutions via studying the TP of the Chengdu No. 6 Water Plant B Project – the first PPP in China’s water sector to reach the TP. Research procedures and outcomes were hierarchically visualized by using Integration DEFinition language 0 (IDEF0) method. Findings: The current transfer management regime of PPPs in China’s water sector is deficient in many aspects. Based on the insight into the practice, a generic transfer process model with hierarchical structure process and sub-processes serving as a dynamic framework transfer model with self-evolving nature is developed to facilitate the successful transfer of the PPP utility. Originality/value: To the authors' best knowledge, this is the first attempt to systematically probe the TP of PPPs. Hopefully, the findings of this paper are to instruct government and PPP practitioners alike on mechanisms for smoothing the TP of further PPP projects ending their concession period.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: case study; China; dynamic framework transfer; idef0; novel model; process; process model; project management; public–private partnership; transfer phase; water sector
Index terms: project management, partnership, smoothing, case study, concession period, China, integration, methodology, exploration, practitioner, literature review, developing country
Subjects: data collection methods, practitioner, environmental resource management, data analysis and analytics, data science, contract structure, research methods, Geography, project management theory and practice, development economics, organizational analysis, partnership management
Topics: Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Sustainability, Procurement, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, International Construction, Organizational Design
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here