Bridging BIM and building (BBB) for information management in construction: The underlying mechanism and implementation

Chen, K and Lu, W (2019) Bridging BIM and building (BBB) for information management in construction: The underlying mechanism and implementation. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(7), pp. 1518-1532. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose: How to make an effective use of building information modeling (BIM) for information management (IM) is a challenging question in the field of construction project and asset management. Chen et al. (2015) answered this question by developing a conceptual framework of “bridging BIM and building (BBB).” However, the underlying mechanism through which BBB can truly impact IM remains unclear. The purpose of this paper is thus to demystify the mechanism linking BBB and IM. Design/methodology/approach: Drawing upon the IM literature, this paper proposes three IM requirements, namely, requirements on information quantity, quality and accessibility, as the significant mediators between BBB and IM. To verify this proposition, a two-year, participatory case study was conducted based on a real-life construction project in which a BBB system was implemented. Findings: The results of the case study supported the proposition that by enhancing the information quantity, quality and accessibility BBB could favorably contribute to IM in construction. Practical implications: This paper provides knowledge about system architecture, components and their linkage in an operable BBB system. It also provides empirical experience about BBB implementation. Originality/value: This study is among the first attempts to streamline the theoretical discourses relating to BBB for IM in a construction context. It contributes to the construction IM by directing attention to key IM requirements and processes rooted in the IM literature.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: building information modelling; information and communication technology applications; information systems
Index terms: implementation, linkage, case study, accessibility, mediator, building information modelling, information system, conceptual framework, system architecture, methodology, construction project, drawing, asset management, information and communication technology
Subjects: inclusive design, research methods, theoretical framing, production management, asset management, information systems, business, design theory, data collection methods, computing systems, dispute resolution, technical documentation, contractual arrangements
Topics: Procurement, Research Practice, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Legal Issues, Design Practice, Digital Applications
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here