Risk of excavators overturning: Determining horizontal centrifugal force when slewing freely suspended loads

Edwards, D; Parn, E A; Sing, M C P and Thwala, W D (2019) Risk of excavators overturning: Determining horizontal centrifugal force when slewing freely suspended loads. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(3), pp. 479-498. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose: Tracked hydraulic excavators are versatile and ubiquitous items of off-highway plant and machinery that are utilised throughout the construction industry. Each year, a significant number of excavators overturn whilst conducting a lifting operation, causing damage to property, personnel injury or even fatality. The reasons for the overturn are myriad, including: operational or environmental conditions; machine operator acts or omissions; and/or inadequate site supervision. Furthermore, the safe working load (SWL) figure obtained from manufacturer guidance and utilised in lift plans is based upon undertaking a static load only. The purpose of this paper is to determine whether the SWL is still safe to be used in a lift plan when slewing a freely suspended (dynamic) load, and, if not, whether this may be a further contributory factor to overturn incidents. Design/methodology/approach: Previous research has developed a number of machine stability test regimes but these were largely subjective, impractical to replicate and failed to accurately measure the “dynamic” horizontal centrifugal force resulting from slewing the load. This research contributes towards resolving the stability problem by critically evaluating existing governing standards and legislation, investigating case studies of excavator overturn and simulating the dynamic effects of an excavator when slewing a freely suspended load at high rotations per minute (rpm). To achieve this, both the static load and horizontal centrifugal force from slewing this load were calculated for six randomly selected cases of an excavator, with different arm geometry configurations. Findings: The results from the six cases are presented and a worked example of one is detailed to demonstrate how the results were derived. The findings reveal that the SWL quoted on an excavator’s lift rating chart considerably underestimates the extra forces experienced by the machine when an additional dynamic load is added to the static load whilst lifting and slewing a freely suspended load. Originality/value: This work presents the first attempt to accurately model excavator stability by taking consideration of the dynamic forces caused by slewing a freely suspended load and will lead to changes in the way that industry develops and manages lift plans. Future research proposes to vary the weight of load, arm geometry and rpm to predict machine stability characteristics under various operational conditions, and exploit these modelling data to populate pre-programmed sensor-based technology to monitor stability in real time and automatically restrict lift mode operations.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction equipment; construction safety; experimental studies; freely suspended load; lifting chart; safe working load; tracked hydraulic excavator
Index terms: hydraulic, real time, supervision, construction industry, modelling, construction equipment, case study, geometry, contributory factor, sensor-based technology, lifting, configuration, methodology, environmental conditions, construction safety, injury, personnel, legislation, manufacturer, experiment, static load, stability
Subjects: fluid mechanics, analytical methods, environmental science, legal systems, innovation and technology management, control systems, practitioner, mathematical modelling, risk assessment, data collection methods, systems engineering, environmental health, industry analysis, health conditions and diseases, project controls, occupational health and safety management, construction equipment, research methods, structural engineering, management
Topics: Legal Issues, Human Resources, Time Control, Health and Safety, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Plant and Equipment, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here