Haji Karimian, S; Mbachu, J; Egbelakin, T and Shahzad, W (2019) Improving efficiency in roading projects: A New Zealand study. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(5), pp. 827-849. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to investigate the key productivity constraints faced by New Zealand (NZ) road pavement maintenance and rehabilitation contractors (RPMRCs) and the associated mitigation measures. Design/methodology/approach: Interview-based exploratory research strategy was used to survey senior managers and directors of medium- to large-sized road contracting firms in NZ. Empirical data were analyzed using the multi-attribute analytical technique. Findings: Results revealed 70 productivity constraints faced by the RPMRCs in NZ; in diminishing order of influence, these constraints were aggregated into eight broad categories as follows: finance, workforce, technology/process, statutory/regulatory compliance, project characteristics, project management/project team characteristics, unforeseen circumstances and other/external factors. The most important constraints in each of the eight broad categories were presented. Research limitations/implications: The key limitation of the research is that it was based on feedback from a limited number of participants which were less than the minimum required to represent the views of the potential participants in the sampling frame for the study. As a result, the findings may not be reliably generalized beyond the scope of the data used. Further research on the subject is recommended to ensure that the representation of the views of the individuals and companies that comprised the sampling frame is achieved. The current findings could be formulated as propositions or hypotheses to be tested in future confirmatory research. Practical implications: At the industry level, the findings could provide the basis for the skill development programs of the NZ RPMRCs. The application of the research findings by the RPMRCs and consultants could result in significant improvement in the productivity of the NZ roading sector and the sector’s enhanced contribution to the economy. Originality/value: Currently, there is little research on the priority constraints to productivity and performance in the NZ roading sector. The findings contribute to knowledge by revealing critical factors constraining productivity performance of the NZ RMRCs and the associated improvement measures. New and more enriching viewpoints were provided on how contractors could leverage their limited resources to address the identified key constraints.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction; construction planning; efficiency; performance; productivity; project management; risk management; road maintenance and rehabilitation; road pavement; strategic management |
| Index terms: | critical factor, productivity, New Zealand, efficiency, key constraint, construction planning, project management, project team, risk management, exploratory research, sampling, survey, skills development, strategy, pavement maintenance and rehabilitation, manager, interview, regulatory compliance, mitigation, methodology, strategic management, program |
| Subjects: | control systems, practitioner, risk assessment, data collection methods, construction planning, project delivery, environmental policy, financial risk, project management theory and practice, personnel development, Geography, performance management, software systems, research methods, maintenance engineering, management |
| Topics: | Site Management, Digital Applications, Human Resources, Quality Management, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Sustainability, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Project Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here