Framing stress and associated behaviours at work: An ethnography study in the United Kingdom

Hampton, P; Chinyio, E A and Riva, S (2019) Framing stress and associated behaviours at work: An ethnography study in the United Kingdom. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(11), pp. 2566-2580. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to understand more precisely the culture and interpersonal behaviours associated with stress. Design/methodology/approach: The research was conducted using a qualitative approach through an ethnographic methodology in relation to three companies. The greater part of the data collection period was structured into observations that ranged between 2 and 4 hr per day, 1–3 days per week, for a period of six months. A total of ten sites were explored; and on each site, the observations involved activities by 5–20 people. Findings: The results showed the pivotal importance of interpersonal relationships in coping with the uncertainty of working conditions, the coordination of teamwork and managing responsibilities and power interactions. It was found that the impact of stress is multifaceted, affecting the physical status, interpersonal relationships, work performance and emotional well-being of construction workers. The workers who were studied emphasised five sources of support that help moderate work-related stress: additional tools such as communication systems and software, a facilitated access to professional help (e.g. psychological services), organisational changes in leadership, provision of resources for the well-being of personnel (e.g. job training) and better teamwork. Practical implications: The study underlines the importance of dedicated services for stress management and specific training-related abilities devoted to reinforcing positive person–organisation dynamics. In particular, the abilities should relate to managing the impact of stress in terms of physique, interpersonal relationships, work performance and emotional well-being. Originality/value: This is one of the first studies to adopt a psychological perspective for understanding construction scenarios and phenomena and was conducted by a qualified psychologist.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction; construction safety; constructions education
Index terms: construction safety, methodology, well-being, United Kingdom, framing, personnel, organizational change, interaction, construction worker, working conditions, coordination, work performance, coping, dynamics, interpersonal relationship, constructions education, qualitative approach, ethnography, teamwork
Subjects: conceptual models, curriculum design, operations management, practitioner, business, mental health and wellbeing, behavioral psychology, environmental health, systems engineering, qualitative and interpretive research, employment law, Geography, management, research methods
Topics: Education, Organizational Design, Legal Issues, Human Resources, Roles and Professions, Sustainability, Health and Safety, Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here