Client and contractor roles in schedule incentive/disincentive projects: An empirical study from India

Hasan, A and Jha, K N (2019) Client and contractor roles in schedule incentive/disincentive projects: An empirical study from India. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(3), pp. 386-407. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose: Delays in construction projects can be very expensive due to their adverse effects on project cost and profit margin. To overcome this problem, clients in the construction industry sometimes use schedule incentive/disincentive (I/D) contracting strategy. However, previous studies have shown that inadequate understanding and wrong implementation of schedule I/D provisions could result in unintended results. Moreover, the use of the I/D contracting method is in its initial stages in many countries such as India. The purpose of this paper is to identify various factors that are essential for schedule I/D success in construction projects. Design/methodology/approach: A questionnaire survey was conducted among experienced professionals (clients, contractors and consultants) from across the Indian construction industry. Findings: Top success factors related to clients in the descending order of their importance are: realistic targets; detailed guidelines for I/D implementation; close coordination with other stakeholders; correct estimation of I/D duration and amount; and imposing disincentives after due consideration. Meanwhile, factors related to contractor organisations are: continuous monitoring and control; thorough understanding of schedule I/D targets; specific considerations in appointing senior project personnel; effective communication; and proper labour management. Research limitations/implications: This empirical research was conducted in the Indian construction industry. Similar studies from developed construction markets may provide more insights into the successful use of schedule I/D provisions in construction projects. Practical implications: The uptake of these recommendations is likely to increase the success of schedule I/D provisions in construction projects, especially in developing countries where the use of I/D contracting strategy is not very popular. Originality/value: This research highlights the specific roles of both clients and contractors in the success of schedule I/D projects in developing countries such as India.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction; construction industry; construction planning; incentive/disincentive; questionnaire survey; schedule; scheduling
Index terms: empirical study, monitoring, construction planning, construction market, coordination, construction industry, duration, implementation, India, contractor organization, estimation, questionnaire, contracting method, methodology, construction project, scheduling, personnel, developing country, project cost, success factor, survey, profit, strategy
Subjects: control systems, organization, data collection methods, financial and cost management, health monitoring assessment and metrics, economic analysis, construction planning, contractual arrangements, operations research, development economics, production management, Geography, research methods, economics, management, industry analysis, project controls, market analysis
Topics: Procurement, Geographical Context, Project Management, Research Practice, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Organizational Design, Site Management, Time Control, Human Resources, International Construction
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here