Haugbølle, K; Larsen, J N and Nielsen, J (2019) Construction productivity revisited: Towards measuring performance of construction output. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(5), pp. 794-813. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose: Construction is repeatedly criticised for its low productivity based on statistical data that do not represent the output of construction adequately. The purpose of this paper is to improve the understanding of construction output – being the numerator in construction productivity calculations – by focussing on changes in quantity of the products, product characteristics and composition of the aggregate rather than as changes in price. Design/methodology/approach: The research design of this study applies statistical data from the national accounts along with data from four paradigmatic case studies of social housing projects covering a period of 50 years. Findings: The results indicate that while construction output prices have increased threefold over the past 50 years, improvements in performance can only explain approximately 20 per cent. Research limitations/implications: The developed four-step method has demonstrated its value as a means to measure changes in the characteristics of the product, but more studies on the actual figures and results over time and regions are required before solid conclusions can be drawn. Social implications: This study has added new knowledge of construction output that supports the development of a more accurate construction statistics, which in turn can assist the design of more effective and evidence-based policies for improving construction productivity. Originality/value: This paper describes and demonstrates a novel performance-based methodology for addressing changes in the characteristics of the products in a longitudinally perspective, which can potentially provide a better understanding of changes in productivity.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | innovation; management; organization; process; productivity; value management |
| Index terms: | value management, construction productivity, social housing, case study, productivity, aggregate, research design, construction statistics, methodology, performance-based, construction output, evidence-based policy |
| Subjects: | public policy, operations management, data collection methods, research design and methodology, materials science, housing and residential development, quantitative and statistical methods, management, performance measurement, research methods |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Value Management, Urban Studies, Research Practice, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Governance |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here