Hopkin, T; Lu, S L; Sexton, M and Rogers, P (2019) Learning from defects in the UK housing sector using action research: A case study of a housing association. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(8), pp. 1608-1624. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose: Maximising the benefit of learning from defects is regarded by UK housing associations (HAs) as a key opportunity to meet their challenges of building more homes with reduced government funding and rent incomes. Despite learning from defects being a frequent recommendation to reduce defects in the construction literature, there is scarce empirical evidence into how HAs actually learn from defects. The purpose of this paper is to better understand how HAs learn from past defects and induce change to reduce defects. Design/methodology/approach: Guided by organisational learning (OL) as the theoretical lens, a 21-month action research (AR) project explored one HA’s defects management and learning processes. Findings: OL has the potential to reduce defects in new homes but is a secondary task which is reliant on a defects management team analysing defect data to identify priority areas. As such, learning from defects can be reduced due to peaks in workload if data analysis is a manual process. Furthermore, a dual learning approach plays a significant role for HA’s learning consisting of designing out defects (codification) supported by networking (personalisation) to tackle issues of workmanship on site and those defects that cannot be designed out. Originality/value: This study demonstrates OL has the potential to reduce defects in new homes but is a secondary task in HA’s practice; and highlights the practical challenges of academia and industry co-production in AR in construction.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | action research; construction; defects; housing associations; management; new-build housing; organisational learning; organization |
| Index terms: | new-build housing, case study, academia, income, funding, workload, networking, action research, data analysis, organizational learning, housing, workmanship, housing association, evidence, co-production, methodology |
| Subjects: | construction type, evaluation and assessment methods, data collection methods, innovation studies, communication, institutional client, data analysis and analytics, economic analysis, management, economic development, research methods, contractual condition, professional development, educational institutions |
| Topics: | Contract Administration, Education, Human Resources, Digital Applications, Urban Studies, Construction Technology, Roles and Professions, Information Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here