Jin, R; Zou, P X; Li, B; Piroozfar, P and Painting, N (2019) Comparisons of students' perceptions on BIM practice among Australia, China and UK. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(9), pp. 1899-1923. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose: University students are the future driving forces in and leaders of the architectural, engineering and construction (AEC) industry advancement. Although BIM pedagogical studies have been performed in different institutions, there has not been sufficient research providing a global perspective of BIM education and students' perceptions toward BIM practice and application following their learning progress. The purpose of this paper is to adopt student samples from Swinburne University of Technology (SUT, Australia), Wenzhou University (WZU, China) and University of Brighton (UK) as three case studies to investigate the BIM practice and application-related perceptions and motivations. Design/methodology/approach: Based on the thorough understanding of the BIM pedagogical delivery including teaching contents and assessment methods among the three institutions, a questionnaire survey approach was adopted to collect AEC students' perceptions of BIM. Within each selected case, statistical analysis was conducted to investigate both the overall sample and subgroup differences regarding students' opinions on BIM’s functions (e.g. as a 3D visualization tool) and BIM usefulness in various industry professions, their motivation in BIM-related jobs and their perceptions of challenges encountered in BIM practice and application. Multiple factors influencing BIM learners' perceptions were discussed, such as pedagogical assessment approach, and individual factors (e.g. disciplines). Findings: The results showed that students were able to discern the latest industry practices and critical thinking in BIM movements. For example, SUT students perceived more challenges from the government legislation or incentive policies, which was consistent with Australia’s BIM policy movement. WZU students tended to have less positive views on BIM usefulness. The results also indicated fewer differences regarding perceived challenges among students from these three institutions. Originality/value: This study contributed to the body of knowledge in managerial BIM by focusing on learners' perceptions from the perspective of students' understanding, motivation and individual views of BIM, which were insightful to both BIM educators and employers. By initiating the framework of BIM learning process and its influence factors, the current study serves as a point of reference to continue the future work in strengthening the connection between institutional BIM education and industry practical needs worldwide.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building information modelling; case study; comparative analysis; constructions education; education; individual perceptions; information and communication technology applications; pedagogy; questionnaire survey; subgroup analysis |
| Index terms: | critical thinking, university student, comparative analysis, methodology, Australia, motivation, 3D visualization, legislation, survey, case study, questionnaire, information and communication technology, body of knowledge, constructions education, profession, strengthening, subgroup, building information modelling, movement, statistical analysis, pedagogy, China |
| Subjects: | information systems, structural engineering, health behaviours and lifestyles, data collection methods, teaching methods, curriculum design, visualization, psychology, institututions, Geography, legal systems, research methods, specialized education, research management, data analysis and analytics, computing systems, knowledge management, data science |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Legal Issues, Engineering Principles, Education, Geographical Context, Information Management, Digital Applications, Roles and Professions, Human Resources |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here