Connecting adaptability strategies to building system lifecycles in hospital retrofits

Kyrö, R; Peltokorpi, A and Luoma-Halkola, L (2019) Connecting adaptability strategies to building system lifecycles in hospital retrofits. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(4), pp. 633-647. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose: The fast advancement of medical technology and processes poses challenges to hospital construction and management. The purpose of this paper is to provide a structured approach to advancing adaptability in hospital retrofits, proposing the preferable timing and scope of different adaptability strategies. Design/methodology/approach: A qualitative research approach was chosen, with 28 semi-structured interviews designers, project managers, clients and healthcare professionals as the primary research data. Findings: This paper presents a model for planning for the future in hospital retrofits. The model includes 11 different adaptability strategies, categorized based on the level of adaptability. Furthermore, each strategy is linked to an open building system level, indicating the appropriate timing. Based on the findings, generality strategies in the tertiary building system level are the most effective forms of adaptability, as they are easy to implement and answer to non-specific changes in hospital operations. Research limitations/implications: The findings contribute to existing knowledge on adaptability in buildings, and provide practical guidance particularly for designers. A new type of service offering, an adaptability roadmap detailing the scope and timing of adaptability, is suggested. Originality/value: The paper contributes to the existing research by detailing different approaches and knowledge related to adaptability and its strategies in hospital retrofits. More specifically, the three-fold categorization of adaptability is linked to both timing and intrusiveness in a novel way.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction planning; management; value management
Index terms: project manager, designer, value management, lifecycle, building system, construction planning, tertiary, interview, open building, strategy, adaptability, healthcare building construction, qualitative research, methodology
Subjects: management, research methods, building construction, design flexibility, profession, data collection methods, user focus, research design and methodology, engineering systems, curriculum development, construction planning, project delivery
Topics: Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Education, Site Management, Value Management, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here