Understanding clients' experience of trust and distrust in dwelling fit-out projects: An ambivalence approach

Ning, Y; Feng, M; Feng, J and Liu, X (2019) Understanding clients' experience of trust and distrust in dwelling fit-out projects: An ambivalence approach. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(3), pp. 444-461. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose: Drawing upon the ambivalence literature, the purpose of this paper is to explore clients' ambivalence caused by the co-existence of trust and distrust and to investigate how clients respond to the ambivalence. Design/methodology/approach: Qualitative research strategies using multiple data sources were adopted. Face-to-face interviews were the major method for gathering data. Additional data sources included archival cases, official reports, regulations and rules and survey reports. Findings: The results identified that clients' ambivalence occurs in the face of the co-existence of trust and distrust. Clients might trust contractors on certain aspects and distrust of others or when they realize that trust and/or distrust have mixed merits and demerits. As a response strategy to the ambivalence, clients may choose to oscillate between trust and distrust in accordance with contractors' quality and cost performance. Research limitations/implications: One limitation is that dwelling fit-out projects are generally small in size. Parties in small size projects might have different mindsets than large projects. Thus, it is worthwhile to extend the framework to the context of large projects. Practical implications: Managers or clients should be aware of the double-edged sword nature of trust and distrust. To deal with the ambivalence resulting from co-existence of trust and distrust, a proper balance of trust and distrust might be effective. Originality/value: This study contributes an ambivalence approach to the trust research in project management.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: ambivalence; construction; distrust; interview; organization; projects; trust
Index terms: survey, mindset, face, strategy, drawing, interview, manager, cost performance, regulation, methodology, qualitative research, project management
Subjects: technical documentation, psychology, health behaviours and lifestyles, practitioner, research design and methodology, data collection methods, political science, project management theory and practice, research methods, economics, management
Topics: Design Practice, Organizational Design, Project Management, Research Practice, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Governance, Roles and Professions
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here