Regis, M F; Alberte, E P V; Lima, D S and Freitas, R L S (2019) Women in construction: Shortcomings, difficulties, and good practices. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(11), pp. 2535-2549. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose: On average, only 10 percent workers at construction sites are women. This percentage, however, is not due to a lack of interest or capacity, but to discrimination against women, sexual harassment and work safety. The purpose of this paper is to identify the main issues and current difficulties of women workers at construction sites, as well as good practices that might provide a better environment for them. Design/methodology/approach: Interviews were carried out with workers and engineers who work/have worked at construction sites, to gather material for a discussion about the gender gap in this environment. The interviews were structured and analyzed around the following topics: acceptance, well-being, installations, gender perception and good practices. Findings: The hiring of women usually occurs at the end of the construction period, which brings up the issue of sexual division of labor. Effects of the glass ceiling and the leaky pipeline phenomena were evident, as well as harassment, discrimination and sexism. Originality/value: Studies about women in engineering have been become relative common, but studies about female workers on construction sites are still scarce. The women interviewed see themselves as warriors, symbolizing the gain of space within the construction sector and in society. It is hoped that the results can contribute to raising awareness about the benefits of gender mainstreaming at construction sites and to promote the health and well-being of women in these environments.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction site; interview; management |
| Index terms: | division of labour, pipeline, good practice, engineer, women, society, interview, mainstreaming, health and wellbeing, construction site, methodology, well-being, construction sector, discrimination |
| Subjects: | sociology, business economics, communities and social development, professional ethics, industry analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, research methods, performance measurement, work location, business, mental health and wellbeing, data collection methods, profession |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Quality Management, Site Management, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here