Whang, S W; Park, K S and Kim, S (2019) Critical success factors for implementing integrated construction project delivery. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(10), pp. 2432-2446. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to identify the critical success factors (CSFs) to implement integrated project delivery (IPD) systems in the Korean construction industry. Design/methodology/approach: This study categorized potential CSFs and analyzed them using factor analysis and multiple regression analysis to choose the best ones based on responses from Korean construction experts. Findings: In total, 29 potential factors were selected and categorized into 7 CSFs using factor analysis. Originality/value: The outcomes of the study are useful as a reference for applying the IPD system in different developing countries and mid-sized construction industries.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | collaborative working; construction management; construction team; management; project delivery |
| Index terms: | factor analysis, project delivery, construction industry, construction team, methodology, multiple regression analysis, critical success factor, developing country, construction project delivery, integrated project delivery |
| Subjects: | development economics, research methods, industry analysis, statistical analysis, project controls, control systems, contractual arrangements, project delivery |
| Topics: | Procurement, Project Management, Research Practice, Time Control, International Construction |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here