Xiong, B; Newton, S; Li, V; Skitmore, M and Xia, B (2019) Hybrid approach to reducing estimating overfitting and collinearity. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(10), pp. 2170-2185. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to present an approach to address the overfitting and collinearity problems that frequently occur in predictive cost estimating models for construction practice. A case study, modeling the cost of preliminaries is proposed to test the robustness of this approach. Design/methodology/approach: A hybrid approach is developed based on the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and principal component regression (PCR). Cost information for a sample of 204 UK school building projects is collected involving elemental items, contingencies (risk) and the contractors' preliminaries. An application to estimate the cost of preliminaries for construction projects demonstrates the method and tests its effectiveness in comparison with such competing models as: alternative regression models, three artificial neural network data mining techniques, case-based reasoning and support vector machines. Findings: The experimental results show that the AIC–PCR approach provides a good predictive accuracy compared with the alternatives used, and is a promising alternative to avoid overfitting and collinearity. Originality/value: This is the first time an approach integrating the AIC and PCR has been developed to offer an improvement on existing methods for estimating construction project Preliminaries. The hybrid approach not only reduces the risk of overfitting and collinearity, but also results in better predictability compared with the commonly used stepwise regression.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | approach; estimating; novel model |
| Index terms: | case-based reasoning, cost estimating, accuracy, artificial neural network, methodology, construction project, school building, estimating, cost information, data mining, regression model, case study, preliminaries, principal component regression, effectiveness, estimate, modelling |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, construction type, modelling and simulation, financial and cost management, analytical methods, data science, research methods, accounting and finance, performance management, professional development, production management, cognitive psychology, statistical analysis |
| Topics: | Project Management, Research Practice, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Cost Management, Construction Technology, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here