Critical success factors for digital partnering of construction organisations: a Delphi study

Aghimien, D O; Aigbavboa, C O and Oke, A E (2020) Critical success factors for digital partnering of construction organisations: a Delphi study. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 27(10), pp. 3171-3188. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose: The construction organisations in developing countries are lagging in digital technology usage; hence, they are still characterised by poor project delivery and technological backwardness. To checkmate this problem, partnering with other organisations was proposed, while critical factors needed for successful digital partnering of construction organisations were assessed. Design/methodology/approach: The study adopted a qualitative research approach. Delphi method was used to get experts' opinion on some identified factors necessary for successful digital partnering. The experts for the study were selected using defined criteria, and a combination of interquartile deviation, Kendall's coefficient of concordance and chi-square was used to achieve robust consensus among respondents. Mann–Whitney U test was also used to ascertain the difference in perception of experts. Findings: The findings revealed trust in digital partners, top management support and digital partner selection as the three key success factors for partnering. Other factors that can be considered alongside these main factors are the creation of a common goal, a long-term commitment, effective communication, proper conflict resolution and structured as well as continuous digital training, workshops and meetings. Practical implications: Instead of going through the digitalisation journey alone, construction organisations, particularly in a developing country like South Africa, stand a better chance of surviving the dynamic construction and digital environment by partnering with other organisations within and outside the industry. Carefully selecting the right partner, trusting in their capability and ensuring constant commitment is necessary for the success of the process. Originality/value: The value of this study lies in its ability to showcase the critical success factors needed for effective digital partnering, an aspect that lacks adequate consideration in the digitalisation of construction industry discourse.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction industry; digital partnering; digital transformation; digitalisation; fourth industrial revolution
Index terms: qualitative research, methodology, top management, critical success factor, South Africa, digital technology, developing country, digitalization, commitment, success factor, fourth industrial revolution, construction industry, project delivery, construction organization, partnering, Delphi method, partner selection, workshop, deviation, conflict resolution, transformation, critical factor
Subjects: research methods, management, development economics, Geography, partnership management, conflict resolution, industry analysis, business, organization, research design and methodology, data collection methods, construction type, risk assessment, control systems, computing systems, psychology, digital technology, project delivery, financial and cost management, health monitoring assessment and metrics, technology adoption
Topics: Cost Management, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Project Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Risk Management, Procurement, Construction Technology, Digital Applications, International Construction, Organizational Design
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here