The multi resource leveling and materials procurement problem: An integrated approach

Almatroushi, H; Hariga, M; As'ad, R and Al-Bar, A (2020) The multi resource leveling and materials procurement problem: An integrated approach. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 27(9), pp. 2135-2161. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose: This paper proposes an integrated approach that seeks to jointly optimize project scheduling and material lot sizing decisions for time-constrained project scheduling problems. Design/methodology/approach: A mixed integer linear programming model is devised, which utilizes the splitting of noncritical activities as a mean toward leveling the renewable resources. The developed model minimizes renewable resources leveling costs along with consumable resources related costs, and it is solved using IBM ILOG CPLEX optimization package. A hybrid metaheuristic procedure is also proposed to efficiently solve the model for larger projects with complex networks structure. Findings: The results confirmed the significance of the integrated approach as both the project schedule and the material ordering policy turned out to be different once compared to the sequential approach under same parameter settings. Furthermore, the integrated approach resulted in substantial total costs reduction for low values of the acquiring and releasing costs of the renewable resources. Computational experiments conducted over 240 test instances of various sizes, and complexities illustrate the efficiency of the proposed metaheuristic approach as it yields solutions that are on average 1.14% away from the optimal ones. Practical implications: This work highlights the necessity of having project managers address project scheduling and materials lot sizing decisions concurrently, rather than sequentially, to better level resources and minimize materials related costs. Significant cost savings were generated through the developed model despite the use of a small-scale example which illustrates the great potential that the integrated approach has in real life projects. For real life projects with complex network topology, practitioners are advised to make use of the developed metaheuristic procedure due to its superior time efficiency as compared to exact solution methods. Originality/value: The sequential approach, wherein a project schedule is established first followed by allocating the needed resources, is proven to yield a nonoptimized project schedule and materials ordering policy, leading to an increase in the project's total cost. The integrated approach proposed hereafter optimizes both decisions at once ensuring the timely completion of the project at the least possible cost. The proposed metaheuristic approach provides a viable alternative to exact solution methods especially for larger projects.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: integration; optimization; project management; scheduling
Index terms: renewable resources, scheduling, project scheduling, integrated approach, mixed integer, experiment, practitioner, methodology, time efficiency, integration, complexity, topology, project manager, package, efficiency, resource levelling, linear programming, project management, cost saving
Subjects: practitioner, data collection methods, profession, mathematical modelling, contractual arrangements, resource management, environmental resource management, operations research, project management theory and practice, management, research methods, geometry and topology, algorithms, performance management, economics, systems engineering, organizational analysis, project controls
Topics: Quality Management, Digital Applications, Time Control, Organizational Design, Site Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Project Management, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Sustainability, Procurement, Roles and Professions
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here