A decision support tool for planning module installation in industrial construction

Farajmandi, M; Ali, M; Hermann, R and AbouRizk, S (2020) A decision support tool for planning module installation in industrial construction. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 27(9), pp. 2615-2641. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose: Properly planned module installation on an industrial site is a critical factor in delivering a project safely, on time and within budget. Different sizes of heavy-duty mobile cranes are used to pick, swing and place the modules. Crane selection depends on module size and weight, as well as crane availability, location and configuration. Weeks can be spent in trial and error to prepare and improve module installation plans due to the large number of ways to install the modules on site, high crane operating costs and other crane-module constraints. A tool to automatically generate module installation plans is essential. Design/methodology/approach: This paper presents a novel heuristic-based methodology for planning and sequencing module installation on industrial construction sites that takes into account proposed technological constraints. Findings: Case studies are presented to demonstrate the ease and effectiveness of the developed methodology in planning module installations. Originality/value: On a complex project, the tool can save time in preparing the installation plan, while also reducing the amount of crane supporting tasks (foundation preparation and crane movement).

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction planning; decision support system; optimization
Index terms: duty, configuration, methodology, movement, decision support, construction planning, industrial construction, complex project, module, effectiveness, operating cost, critical factor, case study, heuristic
Subjects: risk assessment, contractual role, data collection methods, health behaviours and lifestyles, economic analysis, construction planning, strategic project management, architectural elements, performance management, research methods, decision analysis, building construction, systems engineering
Topics: Quality Management, Design Practice, Contract Administration, Site Management, Research Practice, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Risk Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here